<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for the Critical Portion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/</link>
	<description>Thinking beyond productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that you&#039;re talking about mindfulness, both in terms of completing projects and in terms of dieting. Leap into a project without considering efficiency and risk the time suck or some other problem. Leap into a bowl of chocolate fudge and risk...erm...drowning. ;)

Kidding aside,  I add two thoughts to the mix:
(a) Is MY way of doing this project  the most efficient?  This speaks to your first two bullets, but in a different perspective: MY way may not be the best way. Is a different approach (or a handoff to a coworker/subcontractor) called for? 
(b)  I keep looking at that abstract 20% -- who in my organization is most likely to be able to finish that 20% (without taking &gt;80% of the project&#039;s time to do it?). Ideally, there&#039;s a way to maximize one&#039;s under-utilized staff resources (but I haven&#039;t found it yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that you&#8217;re talking about mindfulness, both in terms of completing projects and in terms of dieting. Leap into a project without considering efficiency and risk the time suck or some other problem. Leap into a bowl of chocolate fudge and risk&#8230;erm&#8230;drowning. ;)</p>
<p>Kidding aside,  I add two thoughts to the mix:<br />
(a) Is MY way of doing this project  the most efficient?  This speaks to your first two bullets, but in a different perspective: MY way may not be the best way. Is a different approach (or a handoff to a coworker/subcontractor) called for?<br />
(b)  I keep looking at that abstract 20% &#8212; who in my organization is most likely to be able to finish that 20% (without taking &gt;80% of the project&#8217;s time to do it?). Ideally, there&#8217;s a way to maximize one&#8217;s under-utilized staff resources (but I haven&#8217;t found it yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>The theme is the same but the emphasis is different. The question isn&#039;t how to get the most results for the least effort, but to examine what portion of your current efforts is making the decisive impact. You&#039;re looking for the point of diminishing returns, which is an act of reflection that I don&#039;t think is common. Many people&#039;s impulse is to log more hours at work rather that look at where the results of those hours trail off.

That was why I used the plate analogy. Most people will attempt to finish what&#039;s on their plates rather than think about how much of the food on their plates constitutes &quot;enough.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theme is the same but the emphasis is different. The question isn&#8217;t how to get the most results for the least effort, but to examine what portion of your current efforts is making the decisive impact. You&#8217;re looking for the point of diminishing returns, which is an act of reflection that I don&#8217;t think is common. Many people&#8217;s impulse is to log more hours at work rather that look at where the results of those hours trail off.</p>
<p>That was why I used the plate analogy. Most people will attempt to finish what&#8217;s on their plates rather than think about how much of the food on their plates constitutes &#8220;enough.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vered</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>vered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/06/30/looking-for-the-critical-portion/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>I think many people do this subconsciously. We ask ourselves what is the least amount of effort that would produce the best results. I know I do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think many people do this subconsciously. We ask ourselves what is the least amount of effort that would produce the best results. I know I do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

