<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Went Back to a Digital Organizer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/</link>
	<description>Thinking beyond productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Distribute Your Productivity System</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Distribute Your Productivity System</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>[...] six weeks ago, I lost my Filofax, which I was still using as my main task manager before going back to a digital organizer. I found it three days later, but initially, within minutes of realizing it was lost, I assumed I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] six weeks ago, I lost my Filofax, which I was still using as my main task manager before going back to a digital organizer. I found it three days later, but initially, within minutes of realizing it was lost, I assumed I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Tanner</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>I ride the fence on this one. I love the convenience of my &lt;a href=&quot;http://paperassistant.idearia.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paper Assistant&lt;/a&gt;, but I don&#039;t like to rewrite items on it each week. So I use my &lt;a href=&quot;http://paperassistant.idearia.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paper planner&lt;/a&gt; as a ubiquitous capture tool. Then during my weekly planning session I transfer ongoing items to Outlook and sync with my smartphone.

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ride the fence on this one. I love the convenience of my <a href="http://paperassistant.idearia.com/" rel="nofollow">Paper Assistant</a>, but I don&#8217;t like to rewrite items on it each week. So I use my <a href="http://paperassistant.idearia.com/" rel="nofollow">paper planner</a> as a ubiquitous capture tool. Then during my weekly planning session I transfer ongoing items to Outlook and sync with my smartphone.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The web-based system is ideal for tracking tasks because some take only one day, while others take several, and it would suck to have to rewrite that list every day.&lt;/i&gt;

Most of my tasks are undated next actions, so I had less of a problem with rewriting lists every day. I only put &lt;a href=&quot;http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/04/18/a-pattern-language-for-productivity-pattern-11-hard-landscape/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hard-landscape&lt;/a&gt; items on the calendar: the tasks that were time or date dependent.

But I did have a problem with pages where &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; of the items were crossed off, when one or two items remained undone for several days. I&#039;d want to cross those remaining items off and put them on a fresh page. Some people find seeing a bunch of crossed-off tasks motivating. For me, it was just clutter. I love the ability to check a task and see it disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The web-based system is ideal for tracking tasks because some take only one day, while others take several, and it would suck to have to rewrite that list every day.</i></p>
<p>Most of my tasks are undated next actions, so I had less of a problem with rewriting lists every day. I only put <a href="http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/04/18/a-pattern-language-for-productivity-pattern-11-hard-landscape/" rel="nofollow">hard-landscape</a> items on the calendar: the tasks that were time or date dependent.</p>
<p>But I did have a problem with pages where <i>most</i> of the items were crossed off, when one or two items remained undone for several days. I&#8217;d want to cross those remaining items off and put them on a fresh page. Some people find seeing a bunch of crossed-off tasks motivating. For me, it was just clutter. I love the ability to check a task and see it disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>Great post. Thanks for sharing your journey to paper task management and back. I&#039;ve actually found a dual system to work best for me, too. I use paper for outlining my day, to schedule everything that needs to happen. Then I use a web-based task management system for getting things done. The web-based system is ideal for tracking tasks because some take only one day, while others take several, and it would suck to have to rewrite that list every day. Also, a web-based system gives me reports so I can do some number crunching on how long each task took to complete.  Then I know how much time to allot for similar tasks when i&#039;m jotting down my day on paper again.

BTW, The web-based task management tool I use is called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myintervals.com&quot; title=&quot;Intervals&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Intervals&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Thanks for sharing your journey to paper task management and back. I&#8217;ve actually found a dual system to work best for me, too. I use paper for outlining my day, to schedule everything that needs to happen. Then I use a web-based task management system for getting things done. The web-based system is ideal for tracking tasks because some take only one day, while others take several, and it would suck to have to rewrite that list every day. Also, a web-based system gives me reports so I can do some number crunching on how long each task took to complete.  Then I know how much time to allot for similar tasks when i&#8217;m jotting down my day on paper again.</p>
<p>BTW, The web-based task management tool I use is called <a href="http://www.myintervals.com" title="Intervals" rel="nofollow">Intervals</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Curious Visitor:&lt;/b&gt; I went from working through lists relatively quickly to a slower speed. If practice had been the decisive factor, my speed should have increased, not decreased. That&#039;s why I stressed the difference between theory and practice. In this case, I started out faster because the change of medium initially made me more aware of items that would&#039;ve otherwise been ignored for longer. Once the novelty of the medium wore off, so did my acuity.

To me, paper is just a different medium to implement the same methodology. I could do GTD on clay tablets -- it&#039;s just slower. No matter how agile I could possibly get with a paper planner, the speed of copying and pasting support material into note attachments is will always be faster than writing that information onto a page. I conduct my work primarily through a computer, so it&#039;s inherently easier to extract information for transfer to a PIM. At any rate, I don&#039;t believe in adjusting my process to a tool, but adopting a tool that facilitates my process.

As far as the Filofax pages, I always eliminated past calendar pages and To Do pages where all the items were crossed off. It&#039;s was so much a case of leafing through pages being unbearable; it&#039;s just that I was coming from a tool where the issue was nonexistent. It&#039;s like the Seinfeld joke about admiring the Chinese for sticking with chopsticks even though they&#039;ve seen the fork.

&lt;b&gt;@Charlie:&lt;/b&gt; I think of mine as a dual system: paper for capturing, electronic for organizing and reviewing. The organizing is actually a hybrid as well, since I use file cabinets and have no plans to digitize my paperwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Curious Visitor:</b> I went from working through lists relatively quickly to a slower speed. If practice had been the decisive factor, my speed should have increased, not decreased. That&#8217;s why I stressed the difference between theory and practice. In this case, I started out faster because the change of medium initially made me more aware of items that would&#8217;ve otherwise been ignored for longer. Once the novelty of the medium wore off, so did my acuity.</p>
<p>To me, paper is just a different medium to implement the same methodology. I could do GTD on clay tablets &#8212; it&#8217;s just slower. No matter how agile I could possibly get with a paper planner, the speed of copying and pasting support material into note attachments is will always be faster than writing that information onto a page. I conduct my work primarily through a computer, so it&#8217;s inherently easier to extract information for transfer to a PIM. At any rate, I don&#8217;t believe in adjusting my process to a tool, but adopting a tool that facilitates my process.</p>
<p>As far as the Filofax pages, I always eliminated past calendar pages and To Do pages where all the items were crossed off. It&#8217;s was so much a case of leafing through pages being unbearable; it&#8217;s just that I was coming from a tool where the issue was nonexistent. It&#8217;s like the Seinfeld joke about admiring the Chinese for sticking with chopsticks even though they&#8217;ve seen the fork.</p>
<p><b>@Charlie:</b> I think of mine as a dual system: paper for capturing, electronic for organizing and reviewing. The organizing is actually a hybrid as well, since I use file cabinets and have no plans to digitize my paperwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Gilkey</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gilkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>Upon further reflection, I&#039;ll have to say that I&#039;m currently running a dual system that manages to have the advantages of both types of systems. I may be at the bridge stage, as I see my digital processes being more prominent, but time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon further reflection, I&#8217;ll have to say that I&#8217;m currently running a dual system that manages to have the advantages of both types of systems. I may be at the bridge stage, as I see my digital processes being more prominent, but time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curious visitor</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>curious visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;I was working through my lists faster for a while largely because the medium was new to me.&quot;

Hmm... I see what you mean, but is this really so? If the system is new, you can&#039;t have practiced skills, so you must be slower than your optimal speed. At least, this is what my experience of practice across many fields tells me.

&gt; &quot;I was increasingly irritated with having to leaf through the pages of my Filofax to find items or make new entries.&quot;

I understand your point, and I don&#039;t have a solution, only a suggestion from the lean mindset: were all those pages actually required at that point in time in your Filofax?

Thanks for your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;I was working through my lists faster for a while largely because the medium was new to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; I see what you mean, but is this really so? If the system is new, you can&#8217;t have practiced skills, so you must be slower than your optimal speed. At least, this is what my experience of practice across many fields tells me.</p>
<p>&gt; &#8220;I was increasingly irritated with having to leaf through the pages of my Filofax to find items or make new entries.&#8221;</p>
<p>I understand your point, and I don&#8217;t have a solution, only a suggestion from the lean mindset: were all those pages actually required at that point in time in your Filofax?</p>
<p>Thanks for your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2146</guid>
		<description>You and your iPhone . . . :)

I predict that we&#039;re going to see a bunch of geeks in the next year abandoning their Day Runners and outing themselves as techies again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and your iPhone . . . :)</p>
<p>I predict that we&#8217;re going to see a bunch of geeks in the next year abandoning their Day Runners and outing themselves as techies again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Gilkey</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Gilkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Great post, Andre. I&#039;ve also abandoned my paper-based productivity system, but I&#039;ve declined to write about it until I went through the same process as you have.

What changed the workflow for me was the iPhone and taking on a different, location-based job. I&#039;ll leave it at that teaser for now, but I&#039;ll write about it before too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Andre. I&#8217;ve also abandoned my paper-based productivity system, but I&#8217;ve declined to write about it until I went through the same process as you have.</p>
<p>What changed the workflow for me was the iPhone and taking on a different, location-based job. I&#8217;ll leave it at that teaser for now, but I&#8217;ll write about it before too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lee</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/09/26/why-i-went-back-to-a-digital-organizer/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=488#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts.  I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work.  Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts.  I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work.  Look forward to reading more from you in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

