<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Triage by Context, Time, Energy and Priority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/11/06/triage-by-context-time-energy-and-priority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/11/06/triage-by-context-time-energy-and-priority/</link>
	<description>Thinking beyond productivity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:44:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Kibbe</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/11/06/triage-by-context-time-energy-and-priority/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Kibbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=548#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. GTD can seem overengineered for newcomers because they&#039;re looking at one component at a time (unavoidable, since you have to read sequentially). Over time, the methodology becomes an integrated habit, and priorities start to become more self-evident. It&#039;s hard to convince those who haven&#039;t done the process for a while that it&#039;s not necessary to have a short list of top priorities if you&#039;re not keep your inventory of work in mental RAM. As you review your system regularly and keep it current, priorities are always close to the surface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. GTD can seem overengineered for newcomers because they&#8217;re looking at one component at a time (unavoidable, since you have to read sequentially). Over time, the methodology becomes an integrated habit, and priorities start to become more self-evident. It&#8217;s hard to convince those who haven&#8217;t done the process for a while that it&#8217;s not necessary to have a short list of top priorities if you&#8217;re not keep your inventory of work in mental RAM. As you review your system regularly and keep it current, priorities are always close to the surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://tools-for-thought.com/2008/11/06/triage-by-context-time-energy-and-priority/#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tools-for-thought.com/?p=548#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>&quot;You’ve already narrowed down your options with the previous questions, so it’s likely that the priority choice at this point is a no-brainer. The choice may not be easy, but it’s probably simple.&quot;

I&#039;ve always struggled at first with prioritizing while integrating GTD at first, but when you really follow the methodology for a while, priorities become more and more apparent. And it doesn&#039;t just become easier to spot when using the 4 criteria when deciding what to do, but it also happens I think, in subtle ways, when your going through the the &quot;5 phase workflow&quot; of collecting, etc, and not so subtle when you start to look at the &quot;next horizons levels&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You’ve already narrowed down your options with the previous questions, so it’s likely that the priority choice at this point is a no-brainer. The choice may not be easy, but it’s probably simple.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always struggled at first with prioritizing while integrating GTD at first, but when you really follow the methodology for a while, priorities become more and more apparent. And it doesn&#8217;t just become easier to spot when using the 4 criteria when deciding what to do, but it also happens I think, in subtle ways, when your going through the the &#8220;5 phase workflow&#8221; of collecting, etc, and not so subtle when you start to look at the &#8220;next horizons levels&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
